Israel Ought To Tell Barack Obama To Go To Hell

Who the hell is Barack Obama, and what are his real motives in putting up his finger of shame to Israel, yet again?  Barack Obama opposes Israel’s right to expand its settlements, to hold on to its own land, to protect its own people from rocket attacks, and now – Barack Obama opposes Israel’s right to self-defense.  Barack Obama is positioning himself to be as anti-Israel as is Hamas and the PLO, and Iran, which calls for the destruction of Israel more times a day than its people are required to pray – and the destruction of Israel and all of the Jews is one of the things they routinely pray for.

Just what does Barack Obama think happens to Israel once Iran acquires nuclear weapons?  What does he think happens to the United States and its ability to negotiate and to hold rogue nations like Iran in line?

Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran is a game changer.  Why?  Put a nuclear weapon in the hands of a hot-headed radical Muslim Jihadist and see what they do with it.  We already know what they do with weapons of lesser mass destruction.  We know, because there is a wealth of documented evidence, that these Muslim terrorists are willing to blow themselves up in the process of killing as many Jews, and other “infidels” as they can.  They do it every day.  Barack Obama appears oblivious to it all.

So, while Iran pursues its deranged ambition of attaining nuclear weapons, and comes insanely closer to reaching its goal every day, Israel must worry about the consequences of a nuclear Iran, and a United States, under President Barack Hussein Obama, which has never been more hostile, more disapproving, more antagonistic and opposed to Israel than in any time in its, or our, history.

President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other top officials have delivered a string of private messages to Israeli leaders warning about the dire consequences of a strike.

The ‘dire consequences” of a strike are miniscule compared to the real “dire consequences” of a nuclear Iran.  Both the United States and Israel, and all our allies for that matter, ought to be preparing and gearing up for a possible attack/war on Iran.  How can the United States, and its leaders in Washington, ever expect to keep the Middle east from exploding into absolute chaos if all Iran has to do to shut Washington up is remind Washington it, Iran, has the advantage over us because it, Iran, has nuclear weapons?

The U.S. wants Israel to give more time for the effects of sanctions and other measures intended to force Iran to abandon its perceived efforts to build nuclear weapons.

Giving more time to allow sanctions to work only gives Iran more time to obtain the components of a nuclear weapon and to build it.  Does Barack Obama or any of these egg-head politicians and bureaucrats in Washington really think that once sanctions are in place Iran will be fully prevented from bringing in the necessary materials its needs to build a nuclear weapon?  How arrogant and naive is that?

Tehran has warned that it could retaliate to tightened sanctions by blocking oil trade through the Strait of Hormuz.

This would be, and actually is, irrelevant, considering that America has all the oil it needs for decades to come sitting right under its own sovereign soil and water.  But Barack Obama and the Democrat Party continue to block all efforts to bring this oil to the surface.  And for the heedlessness of Obama and Democrats, Iran would not be in a position of using oil as a scare tactic to force us to back off our threat of tightened sanctions.  Of course we will go ahead with the sanctions, regardless.  Just keep in mind that the steep price at the pump reflects Obama’s and the Democrat Party’s desire to keep that oil underground, not because of imposed sanctions.  In other words, we could impose sanctions on Iran and still see gas prices around 2 dollars a gallon.  That is not such a pipe dream.

But what is a pipe dream and far from reality?

Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful uses.

If there was any evidence that Iran had any “peaceful” intentions in anything it did, perhaps we could believe their story.  However, as we know, Iran remains in a readied state of Jihadism.  And there is nothing “peaceful” whatsoever about Jihadism.

There must come a time when it is realized that Iran will stop at nothing to make its dream of becoming nuclear a reality.  And there is more at stake here than just a nuclear Iran.  Remember, Iran’s Dictator-President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is allied with another fierce anti-American Dictator-President, Hugo “El Diablo” Chavez of Venezuela.  Once Iran has nuclear capability, how long will it be before Ahmadinejad either sells, or gives away, some of its nuclear weapons to its buddy “El Diablo” Chavez?  What happens then, once two anti-Americans rogue dictators have nuclear weapons in their hands?  What happens to that window of opportunity to strike then?  Didn’t we learn anything from 40 years of Cold War with Russia?  Do we want to go through that all over again with Iran?

The U.S. and Iran, however, have taken steps in recent days apparently designed to ease tensions. Iran has agreed to host a delegation of United Nations nuclear inspectors this month.

This is called stalling for more time.  And while tensions between Iran and the U.S. “ease”, the tensions between Iran and Israel, and Israel and the United States, tighten.  Barack Obama is creating quite a topsy-turvy world indeed.  One in which is seeing Israel’s allies thin.  If Barack Obama wins re-election Israel may very well be on its own in defending itself and its people.  In the meantime:

Covert efforts by Israel’s intelligence service to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons have been credited with slowing the program without the high risk of military conflict that could be sparked by an airstrike.

And yet, we cannot escape the fact that Iran is a nation populated with Muslim Jihadists who denounce Israel and the United States with a religious fervor.  But, what happens if Israel does strike Iran?  The same thing that happens when you throw a rock into shallow water.  The water, dirt and sediment is stirred up into an excited frenzy.  However, it all clears and settles back into place shortly and there is calm and tranquility once again.  If Israel strikes Iran, it will be stirred into an excited frenzy also.  So what?  Iran is always stirred into an excited frenzy because Iran refuses to live peacefully.  It will calm down again, to what it is now, which is still very turbulent, very dangerous, but void of nuclear possibilities.

Will putting nuclear weapons in its hands make Iran any calmer?